On 20 March 2012 18:24, Andrew Gray <andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk> wrote: > (The SEO people are correct that Wikipedia has a high Google ranking, > and correct that this is something of an odd skew on Google's part. > What always amuses me is the recurrent belief that Wikipedia > deliberately tries to do this, that we're bribing Google or setting up > carefully-constructed semantic traps in our articles or something - > the fact that it's not a cunning ploy on our part is completely > inconceivable to someone who approaches everything from this > perspective.) >
Perhaps they honestly believe that their keyword-primed advertorial page is actually more useful than a Wikipedia page and are astounded that Google might have the temerity to disagree. ;-) -- Tom Morris <http://tommorris.org/> _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
