Sue Gardner wrote: > Everybody knows that reversing stagnating/declining participation > in Wikimedia's projects is our top priority.
Thank you for sharing this. How much discussion has there been internally about this being the wrong approach? A good number of active editors (who I imagine Wikimedia is also trying to engage and retain) feel that Wikimedia's sole focus is on the numbers game. That is, Wikimedia is all about adding people, but doesn't seem to care about the quality of the content that it's producing (or the quality of the new contributors, for that matter). The vision of the Wikimedia movement is to create a free and accessible repository of (high-quality) educational content; the vision is not about trying to get as many people involved as possible (or even build a movement). Is there a concern that the current focus on simply boosting the numbers (a focus on quantity) is overshadowing the arguably more important goal of improving the content (a focus on quality)? MZMcBride _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
