On Maw, 2005-03-08 at 20:33, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > 1) Calling Europe a Banana Republic doesn't seem to be a good idea. I'm > not sure which country would be in position to do such an assumption.
The quote is chosen for good reason. > 2) It is the European Council, not its Presidency, which adopted > something. The presidency overrode the rules, the council has adopted nothing > 4) The sentence is misleading and seems to mean that the adoption was > against the council's rules. The only thing that was against council's > rules was the way it was decided it would be a point A, and not a point > B. Which makes the adoption against the council rules. Hopefully JURI will have the guts to refer the whole sorry mess to the EU courts _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
