(A little off-topic...) On 9/6/05, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And lets face it, the only reason we find GConf a good option is because > > of the inside joke with the name. For anyone not a core member of the > > community that is lost. > > I like GConf for that reason, and because it's got Conf in it, and it's > a better abbreviation for 'the GNOME Conference' than GNOMECon or > GNOME-Con(which has too many capitals) and GnomeCon violates the > religious doctrine on GNOME capitalisation.
That 'doctrine' ought to be violated as a matter of principal. 5 letters of all caps just sucks. I intentionally write it as Gnome, and will continue to do so. (And if anyone wants to complain about me doing so, feel free to let /dev/null know) :-) _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
