On 9/9/05, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, David Neary wrote: > > > Let's say that it was a mistake, or that distributing the foot under the > > GPL is incompatible with defending it as a trademark - what remedy do > > you think we should consider? > > Seems like that's what redhat does these days: releasing their > product which is Free Software, but you cannot redistribute due > to trademarks. Don't flame me for what I just said, it's here: > > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2005/06/30/esr_interview.html
You can redistribute the source code for Red Hat's RHEL offerings and/or binaries you compile from it, IF you remove Red Hat's trademarks first (which yes, means it isn't RHEL any more, but it's close enough for many); see http://www.centos.org/ and others. _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
