On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 08:29:23PM +0100, Quim Gil wrote: > Apart from Anne's initial (and well intentioned) comment, nobody else > has objected by the fact of Vincent being a candidate at he same time as > he is tied to the election commitee for the impossibility to delegate > now. I guess Anne herself would accept Vincent as candidate even if he > can't leave the comittee. > > I don't know how empowered is the comittee to decide about an issue > affecting the comittee (we will need an expert in Roman law soon) but I > guess that we may just go ahead with the process.
Yes that's true. Vincent has been doing a lot, and as a result found himself in an uneasy position, let's just try to avoid this in the future, but it's all dependant on other people voluteering to help splitting the workload. > About the board requesting 24h more to present candidacies. This 24h > extra hours have also passed, isn't it? Yes, I think so, we took that decision formally on the Board meeting Wednesday, we are now Friday, I think it is reasonnable to close the call for candidates by now. If someone who was candidate but that the recent announcement makes him/her not willing to candidate anymore, will still have the opportunity to resign from the elections, but we shall not accept candidates anymore at this point. > Can we continue the election process then? I think it is all in the hands of the Election commitee, they should resume their normal process. Sorry for the turbulences, fasten your seat belt, we should land shortly :-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
