Selon Bill Haneman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 13:05, Luis Villa wrote: > ... > > > > > > > > > we didn't sign anything, should we? > > > > > > It's a bit surprising since we have this in the trademark usage > > > guidelines: "Do not use GNOME logos unless you have explicit written > > > permission to do so." > > > > > > http://foundation.gnome.org/licensing/guidelines/ > > > > > > We should probably fix this :-) > > > > This is one of the things I want to kill, FWIW. > > > > Luis > > We can't have it both ways. Either we keep the GNOME trademarks, which > requires us to enforce them, or we abandon them. > > We (the Foundation membership) have the right to do either I suppose, > but there does not seem to be a good middle ground, if we do not enforce > the trademark, then anyone who wants to use the GNOME logos for any > purpose, even one that is potentially damaging to GNOME, can do so. To > take an extreme case, someone could even make a release and call it > "Official GNOME" and we could not stop them. > > Bill > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list >
-- Dave Neary Lyon, France _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
