Here's a positive reply, just so you don't think it's all negative. I'll never figure out how to request a representative sample of replies while also avoiding too many replies.
I trust the board to do this and to know if they need to do it, and I have confidence in the proposed new members. I'd prefer delegation, but even the act of delegation requires suitable chunks of time that they might not have right now. If they can't do that quickly then they need to get on and do this now. I supported the reduced-size referendum because I think the board needs to make faster decisions instead of pondering every possibility until the chances have gone by. So well done. If I could set a condition for my Yes, it would be that the new board members would obsessively care for the Foundation's public wiki pages and keep people informed of possible meetings agendas and minutes of completed meetings. You do quite a lot and people should know about it. You might even start referring to not-public-yet agenda items by codenames if necessary, just so we have an idea of how much you are working on. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
