Your idea sounds good but I wonder how efficient is the average human being after >8h meeting in a day.
What about: - 10h-15h board meeting with a sandwich break in between (at 12h30 or so) - 15 - 16h real break - 16 - 18/19h AGM And then 2h board wrap up another day i.e. after the Core days to get common conclusions and assign tasks. I like the idea of a dinner+discussion after the AGM but why not doing it informally with other attendants. :) Last year we were so tired at the end of the all-day meeting that it wasn't clear who had to do what, which IMO affected the output of that meeting. For example, we spent a long time discussing issues and elaborating possible alternatives that weren't discussed again anymore after the GUADEC & summer. PS: the main point here at foundation-list is that we would be going for a 2-3h AGM the afternoon before the Core days, non-board opinions are needed. On 1/9/07, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One note of caution - the all-day board meeting generally does need to > be all-day. -- Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
