On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 23:46 -0400, Corey Burger wrote: > On 10/29/07, Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <quote who="Luis Villa"> > > > > > So, uh... this apparently didn't happen, and now we're getting flamed > > > (rightfully) for appearing to give a stamp of approval to a deeply flawed > > > standard. So... when is the board making this happen? > > > > Although I disagree with the tone and content of your email, an announcement > > is pending about a related issue, which may address concerns (legitimate or > > not) raised about GNOME's involvement in TC45-M. Participation in the TC45-M > > process does not imply approval or support for ISO standardisation of OOXML. > > Wait a sec. The simple matter is that we are getting hammered for > something that isn't even true. How is the board fixing that?
By trying to clarify our position. I agree though that FUD travels much further and faster than facts. > Corey -- behdad http://behdad.org/ "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
