On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:43 AM, Karl Lattimer <k...@qdh.org.uk> wrote: >> Elijah Newren did an initial analysis of the data. His analysis also >> includes >> the survey questions and answers. Find it at: >> >> http://blogs.gnome.org/newren/2009/01/03/gnome-dvcs-survey-results/ >> > > This is pretty decent analysis going on here :) > > I'd like to remind people of John Carr's recent blog post too, someone > mentioned in the survey results actually. JC has been working on bzr with git > protocol support, which would fulfil many of the requirements for having a > GNOME DVCS. >
I'd like to point out that--of the 15 people who regularly use git and bzr--git still won. <http://www.gnome.org/~shaunm/survey/first-picks-permutations.png> It seems to me that a lot of brain power, sysadmin time, and general proliferation of Things To Learn for New People(tm) can be saved if the six people (1.04% of respondents) who ranked bzr above git in that graph can just bite the bullet and admit that git won. Can we please just all move on? My fear is that this effort to keep bzr on life support will cause bzr to show up as a requirement in distcheck for modules maintained by people who are still holding out. _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
