On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Quim Gil<quim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually many GNOME people that was not enthusiastic about a second > joint summit mentioned that one of the problems was that the agenda > didn't help meeting peers with similar interests from the other side. > Something that could be achieved with a better organization of the > agenda, based on this year's experience.
That was exactly my feeling as well. Even though we had both GNOME and KDE people in attendance in the same place, all sessions were segregated. I believe someone else mentioned that having desktop-agnostic tracks would have allowed everyone to see what is going on with banshee, amarok, etc and allow for some much needed information sharing. -- Og B. Maciel omac...@foresightlinux.org ogmac...@gnome.org ogmac...@ubuntu.com GPG Keys: D5CFC202 http://www.ogmaciel.com (en_US) http://blog.ogmaciel.com (pt_BR) _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
