On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Philip Van Hoof <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 14:38 +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote: > > Hi Xavier, > > > On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 13:02 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > > > I disrespect people who claim that this last survey has intentional > > > bias. For me they are being intellectually dishonest. > > > > Giving one definition of a word, > > Lefty gave accurate definitions for the words he used. For example the > word "illegitimate": Richard clearly questioned the legitimacy of > proprietary software and asked us to mirror this statement. This is > archived if you don't believe me. > > Firstly: > > The only person who here might have intentionally created the ambiguity > is the person who first used the word to describe proprietary: Richard. > > I use "might" wisely, I'm not saying this was the intention. > > Have you ever read his manifesto? While you might not agree with his conclusions, his logic would pass most any scrutiny. > Pointing to Lefty for being guilty of intentionally creating ambiguity > is nothing more than either being a moron, or being so disinterested > that you don't know who said what first. > > Moron: > > 1. a person who is (notably stupid or) lacking in good judgment. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > You always seem to devolve into ad-hominem, personal attacks. -- John (J5) Palmieri
_______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
