Hi! > Actually, I think that the Red Hat maintainers of the toolkit had an > interest in stability (for ISVs) and that stifled development. As such > developing anything in GTK+ takes a lot longer than it should and that's > why it is always hard to get into development there or to fix something. > This has long been the internal politic of GTK+.
Well, I think as GTK+ is really deep down in the stack it's stability and code quality is much more important than adding new features. When you look at some of the older GTK+ code (e.g. GtkNotebook) you see what happens without responsible maintainership. I know from personal experience that it is difficult to get stuff into GTK+. It involves poking a lot at the maintainer(s), actually it was always mclasen who committed and commented things. Still, it's possible to get new features in (GtkToolPalette, action-widget for GtkNotebook). I think it should be even easier for bug-fixes. What I see as a bigger problem is that the chance to clean things up for 3.0 might pass because not enough people are working on this. Regards, Johannes
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
