On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 18:19 -0700, Stormy Peters wrote:
> Because you are being disruptive on the Foundation List.
Again. That's your believe. Good for you.
> People are not interested in having this argument and you are causing
> people to unsubscribe to the Foundation List and to quit
> participating.
That's their action. And you can't control that.
(what's your point?)
> If you do support GNOME, then please stop turning every thread into an
> argument. Respond to things you perceive as argumentative off list.
I do support GNOME. I want its Foundation to be strong.
> If people don't respond, assume they are not interested in that topic.
Sure.
> I will not be replying to this thread publicly any more.
Although your reply is fair, I did ask these three questions:
1) > Why didn't the GNOME Foundation take a stance on that?
2) > Wasn't that formulation starting an argument with me?
3) > And how wasn't it? If it wasn't.
Why aren't you answering those questions?
Cheers,
Philip
--
Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
http://pvanhoof.be/blog
http://codeminded.be
_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
