2010/6/3 Andreas Nilsson <nisses.m...@home.se> > On 06/03/2010 02:54 AM, Seif Lotfy wrote: > > > >> And don't get me wrong -- I happen to disagree with some stuff they're >> doing from time to time. But it doesn't mean I should stop trusting >> them. >> > > But would't you like to have the points you disagree with be discussed or > reevaluated? > I think this is the issue the community is facing. There is a difference > between "We are going to do it like that because we think its right, and > that is how it is gonna be" and "We are doing it like that because we think > it is right, but we are open for discussion" > Right now the Shell developers are somewhere between both stand points. I > know some developers who were able to cooperate with them. But I think > more transparency around discussions and evaluations are missing. > > > Just a quick note regarding the design procedures here. > From my experience, Jon and Jeremy hang out both hang out in #gnome-design > all day and are publically discussing all design issues there (even down to > the smallest details). > Me, Hylke, Garrett, Jakub and others have all been giving feedback, drawing > mockups and evaluating designs, even though, as always, Jon and Jeremy have > been doing most of the job (as us others have other day jobs and > priorities). > - Andreas > > This would be a good FAQ. We really do need a gnome-shell FAQ I think. I might help out on the whole community thing on shell if people are willing, it depends on whether this six month project I'm on comes to a close. My contributions have tapered off due to a high work and personal load.
sri
_______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
