On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Patryk Zawadzki <pat...@pld-linux.org> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Shaun McCance <sha...@gnome.org> wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 06:38 -0700, Sandy Armstrong wrote: >>> Tomboy is LGPL2. >> Right, so some developers may choose to license their apps >> or plugin frameworks liberally to allow proprietary plugins. >> We don't need a morality debate on the existence of those >> plugins on this list (please). But I think most would agree >> that our servers shouldn't host non-free software. > > It's not really a question of morality, how would we prevent a user > from installing both a GPL and a non-OSI plugin for Tomboy at the same > time?
Forgive my ignorance, but isn't that perfectly allowed as long as the user doesn't then distribute the combination? In other news, I agree with Shaun that a hypothetical a.g.o should only host free software. Sandy _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
