On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Og Maciel <ogmac...@gnome.org> wrote:

>
> Understood. I hope you'll accept my word that I am fully committed to
> the work I do for the GNOME Foundation and that the fact I was
> confused about being present at said meeting was by no means lack of
> my interest or commitment. I have been to one too many meetings and
> was truly confused. I sure hope this lapse won't tarnish all the hard
> work I have done so far.
>

I do appreciate all the work you've done, especially the Friends of GNOME
work.

I apologize if I over reacted but the mail saying you don't remember so you
were going to say you were there, seemed flippant to me. If I didn't
remember if I was there or not, I'd mark myself absent. The point isn't to
show how much work you've done but to represent GNOME. And I'd be worried I
was endorsing conversations I hadn't been a part of it.

And in part, I was concerned that you were making it look like it wasn't
important to everyone.

I do appreciate all the work the directors do. It's an important role and I
respect all of you for putting the time and effort into making the GNOME
Foundation and GNOME successful. I know it's a lot of work that isn't always
recognized.

Thank you for helping make GNOME accomplish its mission.

Stormy
_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list

Reply via email to