So, I assume that although it was a mail to discuss things about accessibility, on GNU mailing list, for some reason, gnu-prog-disc...@gnu.org was more suitable that gnu-accessibility. What was that reason?
I don't remember that particular message, but here are some possibilities that occur to me: * Something about accessibility came up in the middle of a discussion on gnu-prog-discuss about something else. * Someone who is on gnu-prog-discuss wanted to raise an issue concerning accessibility, and he isn't on gnu-accessibility, and maybe doesn't know it exists. * Someone thought of the accessibility issue during a discussion on gnu-prog-discuss, and didn't ask himself "What other GNU mailing lists are there and which one is the best one for this topic", but simply raised it on gnu-prog-discuss straightaway. * Someone thought carefully about which list to use, and judged that gnu-prog-discuss was best for some reason I don't know. Not knowing the reason, I won't venture to say I agree or disagree. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org www.gnu.org Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software. Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category/tel/ _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list