On 10/15/2012 06:53 AM, Andrea Veri wrote: [...]
> I explained the benefits in my original mail but here they are again: > > - services, that means having the ownership of your nick. No one will > be able to spoof your identity. (plus host cloaking with handy (for > example) /gnome/marketing/foo that may help newcomers finding the > right person to talk when the first join a certain channel.) > - privacy, Freenode has SSL enabled so all conversations are crypted > and don't happen in plain text. > - no need to keep a bot to auto OP you every time you accidentally > lose connection. These would be nice to have. But I wonder if the best way to address it is not to up and leave GimpNet, but instead to get those features added to GimpNet. > In the past I've joined the #opers channel multiple times asking why > there was no intention to improve the GIMPNET network but I alwais > received no answer and as of today I still don't know the real reason > behind that decision. Who exactly "owns" GimpNet and if asking on #opers doesn't get us the answers we seek, how else can we get them? Take care. --joanie _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
