On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 11:50 +0100, Dave Neary wrote: > On 11/14/2012 11:38 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 16:07 -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > >> I'm looking for some talented folks who can help us engage with the > >> press, on blogs, on mailing lists and explain our vision. > > > > I hope it's slightly better handled than Emily last 2 posts, which > > managed to say that the removal of fallback was badly communicated (!) > > without details of what was done wrong, and used a blog post by a troll > > to make false assertions about GTK+ 3.x's API stability. > > > > You might want to vouch for your community managers before you let them > > loose... > > Really? Your solution to "we have a PR problem" is "criticise the only > people trying to address that problem by publicly saying they suck at it"?
Telling X you'll teach them how to communicate with Y and then creating a problem with X because of the way you communicated with Y. Tell me how exactly I should have brought this up "privately". We have very few private mailing-lists in GNOME, and it wasn't discussed on any of those I would be on [1]. > Sheesh. Yeah, me too. [1]: Not a cabal, it's Board-related lists. _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
