----- Mensaje original -----
> De: Andre Klapper <[email protected]>
> Para: [email protected]
> CC:
> Enviado: Lunes 31 de diciembre de 2012 17:24
> Asunto: Re: GNOME Quarterly Reports
>
> On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 12:45 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
>> Perhaps it means our current way
>> of doing them is not successful, and we need to try something else.
>
> So in case anybody wants to assemble what's going on and present it in a
> better way, I am happy to help out.
>
> Currently I don't plan to send out further calls for quarterly reports
> (as it would be the case again tomorrow).
>
there is a mismatching between
Hi,
I personally think that the major drawback is that there is a mismatch between
the quarterly reports and our release scheme. IMHO, it would be easier if we
adapt our reports to the our release scheduler. One of the inmediate advantages
of this can be that can be used for writing the release notes more accurately
in time. I think a quarterly reports can be thought as a sort of logs of the
work developed by the teams in every release. And I think they should be
updated everytime a new milestone has been reached.
Just my two cents,
-- Juanjo Marin
_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
