On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Shaun McCance <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 14:59 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> > The only way it would make sense to me is if we had some expectation
> > that over time that the number of users would grow to a significant
> > fraction of the GNOME membership.
>
> I understand the maintenance burden, and that it's not worthwhile
> for only a small handful of users. But it's clear from the thread
> that most people didn't even know we have an XMPP server. How many
> users would we have if we actually publicized it?
>
> I do think we should push XMPP harder and build more services on
> top of it, and having a server for members can help us prototype
> stuff like that. But I'm not writing the code or maintaining the
> server, so meh...
>


I think the point is well taken that the service never really got a chance
because it wasn't well advertised.  I can imagine from a sysadmin
perspective that XMPP would serve some interesting use cases for alerting
for system events or other things or maybe build failures.

I have a hard time though thinking it is a superior chat system compared to
IRC.  Mostly because, we have bots, we have just added some new IRC
services.  Plus some of us run irc under screen, giving us 24/7 access to
chat so we don't miss conversations.

I think XMPP has a place, but chatting isn't one of them.

sri
_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list

Reply via email to