On 15-11-05 10:08 AM, Benjamin Berg wrote: > Actually, the way I read section 8.2.4 combined with 8.4.1 right now it > seems perfectly sane to argue that Christian could have finished his > term in office despite the change of affiliation.
Would the board and Christian consider doing this, and also establish precedent that in the future, only affiliation at the time of candidacy is relevant to the 40% rule? b _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
