Hi, Are there any significance difference between CES/CER and MLX/XMR software feature specifically for MPLS/VPLS ?
Regards, Samit Joel Mulkey wrote: > We have quite a few of the CES2000 ME-PREM units in place. We're very happy > with them. We're using MPLS VLL and VPLS, RSVP, OSPF, MRP, and other basic > features. We have had zero hardware failures (we installed them at the > beginning of the year). We've kept them on the latest code and have had very > few issues with bugs. The bugs we did have were all fixed and they're running > smoothly now. > > Prior to this purchase we looked at the Juniper J-series and we steered clear > of them primarily due to the software-forwarding. They also seem to have > quite a few configuration limitations in comparison with the M-series boxes. > The config limitations of the CES are minimal (for our needs) and are slowly > eroding in new versions of code. > > Joel Mulkey > CIO > Freewire Broadband > Direct: 503-616-2557 | Support: 503-614-8282 > http://www.gofreewire.com > http://twitter.com/FreewireNetwork > > On Aug 24, 2010, at 9:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> Am 23.08.2010 16:56, schrieb William Jackson: >>> Does anyone have any feedback regarding features/stability and >>> performance on these platforms? >>> >>> We are looking at upgrading our some equipment and whilst waiting for >>> demo units to arrive would like to hear what others think have >>> experienced? >>> >>> We have been looking at Juniper SRX650 boxes, which whilst are feature >>> rich are software forwarding and don?t have hardware forwarding for >>> routed traffic. > > > _______________________________________________ > foundry-nsp mailing list > [email protected] > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp > > _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
