I don't believe there's a way to reconfigure the BigIron; however, you'll likely get even load balancing if you can create two separate sessions / flows. Is that possible in your situation?

On Oct 29, 2010, at 3:40 AM, Dana wrote:

Hi all,

I have noticed a little problem with our LAG configurations in our Bigiron RXes. The problem description is as follows:

We have configured a LAG of two or more ports. From time to time we are getting a high utilization port message from our monitoring system on one of the two/more ports in that LAG. Thus, it seems that the software does not share the traffic evenly amongst the available ports.

After reading the manual, I understand that there is no way we can manipulate the load-sharing method of our LAGs. BigIron RXes only load-share using HASH-BASED method. Although Foundry/Brocade claims that this method should do the job properly, it is not the case in our network. Let me give you some lines to show the problem:

lag "trunk-1" static
ports e 2/7 to 2/8
primary-port 2/7
deploy

#sh int e 2/7 | i util
300 second input rate: 155247818 bits/sec, 39455 packets/sec, 15.90% utilization 300 second output rate: 25029300 bits/sec, 11300 packets/sec, 2.61% utilization

sh int e 2/8 | i util
300 second input rate: 189413832 bits/sec, 44085 packets/sec, 19.36% utilization 300 second output rate: 482937687 bits/sec, 79502 packets/sec, 49.05% utilization

As you can see above, the output rate (from BIRX to an FWSX) has a ratio of 49% vs 2%. However, if you look at the input rate (from FWSX to BIRX), it has more or less the same amount of traffic 19% vs 15%.

My question is now, is there anyway we can do in the BIRX to get the two ports more balanced? I hope some of you has experienced the same problem and could share the solution/trick with me.

Thanks in advance.


--
Dana


_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
[email protected]
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
[email protected]
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Reply via email to