We are not using PBR, but we do use L2 and L3 ACLs (L2 extensively) and 
everything has worked as outlined in the config guide. The CES/XMR platform is 
far better than the FESX platform when it comes to combining features. For us 
this means that we can now rate limit, modify prioritization, and perform other 
functions on a single port, where with the FESX we had to pick and choose 
because we could not use features simultaneously on a port.

Joel Mulkey
CIO
Freewire Broadband
Direct: 503-616-2557 | Support: 503-614-8282
http://www.gofreewire.com
http://twitter.com/FreewireNetwork

On Feb 23, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Chen, Qinxue wrote:

> Thank you Joel. Do you see any limits on ACL+PBR for CES?
> 
> -Qinxue 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joel Mulkey
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 10:59 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [f-nsp] FESX648 vs. NetIron CES 20204
> 
> Yes, we had a substantial FESX network and last year swapped it out for
> a CES and XMR network. The FESX boxes worked well until pushed.
> Utilizing advanced features such as MRP, UDLD, OSPF, and BGP on them
> simultaneously showed their limitations. The CES uses dual CPUs, one for
> the linecard and one for the management processing, so it handles those
> advanced protocols much better. Our network is now far more stable than
> it was with the FESX equipment. Not to mention the expanded and improved
> feature support.
> 
> Joel Mulkey
> CIO
> Freewire Broadband
> Direct: 503-616-2557 | Support: 503-614-8282 http://www.gofreewire.com
> http://twitter.com/FreewireNetwork
> 
> On Feb 23, 2011, at 9:00 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>> 
>> Does anyone have experience on NetIron CES? Is it stable enough to 
>> compare with FESX? We are trying to make a decision on which one to 
>> choose.
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp


_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
[email protected]
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Reply via email to