Fesx6xx has support as well.
Adam On Apr 23, 2011, at 11:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Send foundry-nsp mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of foundry-nsp digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. No IPv6 for FCX -- AT ALL???? (George B.) > 2. Re: No IPv6 for FCX -- AT ALL???? (Mike Allen) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:58:13 -0700 > From: "George B." <[email protected]> > To: foundry-nsp <[email protected]> > Subject: [f-nsp] No IPv6 for FCX -- AT ALL???? > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > So I was looking at an application coming up, this just can't be real. I > am looking at the release notes for the latest code for FCX and is this > right? Tell me this is a misprint. No IPv6 support at ALL? Not even > static routes? I have an old Cisco Cat6500 with Sup-II modules that will > static route IPv6. > > So in a small form factor the *only* hardware Brocade has capable of doing > IPv6 is CER/CES??? Please tell me this is not correct and is some sort of a > documentation goof. > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20110422/1d5f27dc/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:55:24 -0700 > From: Mike Allen <[email protected]> > To: "George B." <[email protected]> > Cc: foundry-nsp <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [f-nsp] No IPv6 for FCX -- AT ALL???? > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > George, right now that is correct, but it is changing. With the next major > software release, IPv6 routing will be supported on the FCX with no > additional licensing or cost. Still a couple months out, but it is being > addressed. > > Mike > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:58 PM, George B. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So I was looking at an application coming up, this just can't be real. I >> am looking at the release notes for the latest code for FCX and is this >> right? Tell me this is a misprint. No IPv6 support at ALL? Not even >> static routes? I have an old Cisco Cat6500 with Sup-II modules that will >> static route IPv6. >> >> So in a small form factor the *only* hardware Brocade has capable of doing >> IPv6 is CER/CES??? Please tell me this is not correct and is some sort of a >> documentation goof. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> foundry-nsp mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/foundry-nsp/attachments/20110422/2496c4fc/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > foundry-nsp mailing list > [email protected] > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp > > End of foundry-nsp Digest, Vol 99, Issue 18 > ******************************************* > _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
