I would get the -RT if doing BGP peering with full feeds. Its claim to fame is 1 million routes in FIB as far as I am concerned. If you are doing full feeds, particularly dual-stacked IPv4/IPv6 then yeah, the RT is where I would go. For internal use or only partial routes, probably not.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Frank Louwers <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > For a project I am looking at the CER range, in particular the RT ones. They > are supposed to be "better" dan the non-RT ones (more tcam etc). The > pricelist shows them as having only the "BASE" license, with no option to buy > them with the advanced license. Do the RT's have every feature of advanced > license on the non-rt ones? (eg mpls)? Or do you still need an upgrade to > benefit from MPLS on them? > > Regards, > > Frank > _______________________________________________ > foundry-nsp mailing list > [email protected] > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
