I hate to reply to myself but I noticed that even though the switch is running router code and it's IP addresses are all handled via the VE when I do show ARP it is still seeing the arp on the physical ports rather than the VLAN.
This is pretty unfortunate. Thanks, -Drew -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Drew Weaver Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 10:16 AM To: '[email protected]'; [email protected] Subject: Re: [f-nsp] Asymmetrical routing on ADX That's exactly my stance on this issue. It's especially annoying considering that the two physical ports in question are attached to a VLAN/Virtual Ethernet, I don't understand why it matters which physical interface in the VLAN handles the traffic destined for the VE.. To me that is really broken. Thanks, -Drew -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 3:08 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [f-nsp] Asymmetrical routing on ADX On Fri, June 1, 2012 12:25, Drew Weaver wrote: > Why is asymmetrical routing bad if you have a complete mesh? It isn't (even without a complete mesh). Asymmetric routing is commonplace and normal, if you need a chokepoint to apply some sort of network policy (load balancing, firewalling, etc.) you need to make sure that you make it a chokepoint both coming and going, and if gear can't handle the next-hop (or even the interface that it uses) may be different for transmitted and received traffic, then bug reports need to be filed. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
