Hello, This is indeed bad news as I am starting IPv6 deployment on our new backbone :-/
I am not sure a /126 would be a better solution regarding the potential security threats it raises. Maybe someone at Brocade is reading this thread and could give us a feedback on this ? Greg ?!? Thanks. Y. 2012/8/27 Wouter Prins <[email protected]> > Hi Youssef, > > If you look at the release notes of 5.3.00b and look into defect > DEFECT000391863 a /127 is unsupported on brocade. :( > > On 27 August 2012 11:44, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Community, > > > > Running MLXe boxes with 5.3.0b, I was wondering if /127 masks on p2p > > interfaces were supported ? > > > > According to RFC6164, it should be : > > ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc6164.txt > > > > I have found no mention of it in NetIron ConfGuide 5.3.0a. I will be > testing > > it anyway but wanted feedbacks for the community. > > > > More Specifically, is the first address Prefixe::0000/127 usable ? > > > > Thank you. > > > > Best. > > > > Y. > > > > > > -- > > Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > foundry-nsp mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp > > > > -- > Wouter Prins > [email protected] > -- Youssef BENGELLOUN-ZAHR
_______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
