Hi Eric For the most part, yes to both.
Take a look at this document here (pages 19 & 20): http://community.brocade.com/servlet/JiveServlet/previewBody/1848-102-1-3553/Brocade-Cisco%20Comparison.pdf Kind Regards, Josh Farrelly Infrastructure Architect, ICTS. Manukau Institute of Technology From: Eric A Louie <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, 5 October 2012 11:07 AM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [f-nsp] Tagged interfaces I'm preparing to translate some Foundry configurations to Cisco. As far as I can tell, the tagged interfaces are really just 802.1q trunk ports. Is that an accurate assessment? Foundry allows multiple IP addresses on the Ethernet interface. Do I have a choice to use vlan interfaces and/or Ethernet sub-interfaces on the Cisco to provide the same functionality? Much appreciated, Eric Louie
_______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
