From: [email protected] > > * [email protected] (Nick Hilliard) [Wed 30 Jan 2013, 20:15 CET]: > >On 30/01/2013 18:03, David Hubbard wrote: > >>Hi all, is anyone using either a TurboIron 24x or the ICX 6650 in > >>an IPv6 environment? > >The TI-24X doesn't do ipv6 and never will. I believe the ICX6650 > >does, although I haven't poked around with them. > > It doesn't *route* IPv6. It will switch it fine, which the original > poster plans to have them do. All the questions about IPv6 neighbor > tables are of no consequence (save, perhaps, a caveat on multicast). > > Also, a pox on greylisting. >
Yep I was being stupid, got my layer 2 and 3 confused after too much ipv6 over-thinking. Someone else cleared it up with me off-list. We're okay on the layer 3 side with what we have upstream from where these would go. Any particular reasons to look at 6650 over TI24x for layer 2 specifics if we don't need that many ports either way? Thanks, David _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
