Check if you have a lot of IP addresses configured on interfaces.  The rACL has 
to be applied for each inbound IP address the router could be listening on.  
The limited CAM size for rACLs can have an impact if there are a lot of IPs and 
the ACL is long.  

Regards,
Mike


On Jan 23, 2014, at 8:14 AM, Darren O'Connor <[email protected]> wrote:

> Last weekend we added new receive ACLs to our XMRs. All our XMRs (4, 8, and 
> 16) have identical TCAM profiles set up.
> 
> I had applied the new receive ACL to 4 XMR4s with no problems. When applying 
> it to an XMR16 in-band I lost connection to the box. Going through OOB I 
> removed and re-added the ACL. I was shown this error:
> 
> Port 16/1, IP Receive ACL 199 exceed configured CAM size, larger partition 
> size required.
> Unbinding IP Receive ACL 199
> Port 2/1, IP Receive ACL 199 exceed configured CAM size, larger partition 
> size required.
> Unbinding IP Receive ACL 199
> Port 9/1, IP Receive ACL 199 exceed configured CAM size, larger partition 
> size required.
> Unbinding IP Receive ACL 199
> Port 6/1, IP Receive ACL 199 exceed configured CAM size, larger partition 
> size required.
> Unbinding IP Receive ACL 199
> Port 5/1, IP Receive ACL 199 exceed configured CAM size, larger partition 
> size required.
> Unbinding IP Receive ACL 199
> Port 3/1, IP Receive ACL 199 exceed configured CAM size, larger partition 
> size required.
> Unbinding IP Receive ACL 199
> Port 1/1, IP Receive ACL 199 exceed configured CAM size, larger partition 
> size required.
> Unbinding IP Receive ACL 199
> Port 4/1, IP Receive ACL 199 exceed configured CAM size, larger partition 
> size required.
> Unbinding IP Receive ACL 199
> 
> Port 16/3, IP Receive ACL 180 exceed configured CAM size, larger partition 
> size required.
> Unbinding IP Receive ACL 180
> 
> 
> Odd, as mentioned all my cam-partitions are identical across all boxes. After 
> this happened I did not try and add it to any other box as it was too 
> disruptive.
> 
> Any ideas why I would get this? Currently on 5.4d and was upgrading to 5.4e 
> on the night.
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Darren
> http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie
> 
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

*----------- H U R R I C A N E - E L E C T R I C ---------->>
| Mike Tindle | Senior Network Engineer | [email protected]
| ASN 6939 | http://www.he.net | 510-580-4126
*--------------------------------------------------->>

_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
[email protected]
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Reply via email to