Just spoke with a sysadmin working out of a different datacenter. They have FESX648-PREMs deployed and they're running sxr07400e.bin firmware as well. Completely stumped at this point :-/
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:38 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]>wrote: > I just had a replacement FESX648-PREM delivered overnight, hooked it up > and initially all looked good. However, when I imported my config and moved > over all of the CAT5e cables, the packet loss and erratic pings resumed. > > Assuming that there was some firmware issue at play, I started removing > different parts of my config while running a continuous ping test in the > background. The moment I removed all rate-limiting from the device, packet > loss halted and ping times stabilized. However, I continue to have problems > downloading files at full speed -- speed test files will do these 'stop and > start' pauses. Ultimately I can only average 6MB/s where I'd > normally expect to pull down at least 200MB/s. > > My original switch was running sxr07400e.bin and the replacement is > running sxr07400d.bin > > All my other switches are FESX448-PREMs, so unfortunately I don't have an > existing example config to model after. > > Anyone recommend a boot ROM and firmware version that works well with a > FESX648-PREM? > > > > > On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:36 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]>wrote: > >> This is a stand-alone switch in a cabinet so no L2 loop there. Pretty >> simple setup -- single BGP session with an upstream provider with the >> default route pointing right to them. CPU utilization currently sitting at >> 1%. >> >> Initially when I noticed the packet loss I thought I was getting DoS >> attacked, but I have sFlow monitoring activated on all ports and don't see >> anything out of the ordinary. >> >> I'll check the boot time diagnostics soon -- thanks for your input. >> >> - Elliot >> >> >> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Jeroen Wunnink | Hibernia Networks < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Could be a L2 loop or ddos against the mgmt IP. is the CPU load also >>> high? >>> >>> >>> On 07/05/14 20:46, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I believe I have a failing switch on my hands and I'm wondering if you >>> might be able to provide an assessment based on the symptoms I've seeing. >>> >>> I'm currently running a Foundry FESX648-PREM with the following >>> version info: >>> >>> SSH@FESX648 Router>show version >>> SW: Version 07.4.00eT3e3 Copyright (c) 1996-2012 Brocade >>> Communications Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. >>> Compiled on Dec 11 2013 at 19:00:43 labeled as SXR07400e >>> (4593059 bytes) Primary sxr07400e.bin >>> BootROM: Version 07.4.01T3e5 (FEv2) >>> HW: Stackable FESX648-PREM6 (PROM-TYPE FESX648-L3U-IPV6) >>> >>> ========================================================================== >>> Serial #: FL18090011 >>> License: SX_V6_HW_ROUTER_IPv6_SOFT_PACKAGE (LID: XXXXXXXXXXX) >>> P-ASIC 0: type 0111, rev 00 subrev 01 >>> P-ASIC 1: type 0111, rev 00 subrev 01 >>> P-ASIC 2: type 0111, rev 00 subrev 01 >>> P-ASIC 3: type 0111, rev 00 subrev 01 >>> >>> ========================================================================== >>> 300 MHz Power PC processor 8245 (version 0081/1014) 66 MHz bus >>> 512 KB boot flash memory >>> 8192 KB code flash memory >>> 256 MB DRAM >>> The system uptime is 26 minutes 49 seconds >>> The system : started=warm start reloaded=by "reload" >>> >>> >>> Quick summary of the symptoms: >>> >>> 1. These problems started only after ~15 servers were connected to the >>> switch. Although many servers were connected, utilization remains low, only >>> ~40Mbit on a 1Gbit uplink. >>> >>> 2. I just rebooted my switch 20 minutes ago, but I'm already seeing a >>> ton of FCS errors across many ports: http://pbrd.co/SABLtk >>> >>> 3. Inexplicably high and erratic ping times (80ms, instead of the >>> usual 20ms over the same route and variation of +- 20ms on every ping). >>> Ping times were low and stable before many servers were connected. >>> >>> 4. High packet loss. Before a lot of servers were connected, there was >>> no packet loss. Yesterday, the packet loss was hovering around 10%. It >>> seems to be worsening now. Today the average packet loss is 20%. >>> >>> Screen capture: http://pbrd.co/SADKO7 <http://pbrd.co/SABZ3D> >>> >>> 5. Yesterday I was also able to temporarily eliminate packet loss and >>> the high ping times by disabling specific ports. Today, disabling ports 7 >>> and 11 has no effect. >>> >>> 6. The cross-connect cables were suspect, but all cables have since >>> been tested with a MicroTest PentaScanner and all passed. We even replaced >>> the CAT5 cross-connect with a machined and molded CAT6 cable -- the same >>> packet loss and erratic ping times persisted. >>> >>> 7. Other strange things have happened. Yesterday I attempted to >>> connect up two new servers to the switch on port 37 and 38. Ports 5-48 >>> belong to the same default VLAN. The servers could connect to the switch, >>> and ping the gateway IP, but they could not ping to the outside world. I >>> then moved the CAT5 cables to ports 22 and 23 -- same VLAN -- and >>> everything worked perfectly. >>> >>> Does this seem like a failing switch? Are there any further diagnostic >>> tests I could run to verify this? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Elliot >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> foundry-nsp mailing >>> [email protected]http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Jeroen Wunnink >>> IP NOC Manager - Hibernia [email protected] >>> Phone: +1 908 516 4200 (Ext: 1011) >>> 24/7 NOC Phone: +31 20 82 00 623 >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
