Hi James,

These are older XMR cards, basically the equivalent of the MLX –X cards.

Module                                                      Status              
         Ports
M1 (left ):NI-XMR-MR Management Module                      Active
M2 (right):
F1: NI-X-SF  Switch Fabric Module                           Active
F2: NI-X-SF  Switch Fabric Module                           Active
F3:
S1:
S2: NI-XMR-1Gx20-SFP 20-port 1GbE/100FX Module              CARD_STATE_UP       
         20
S3:
S4: NI-XMR-10Gx4 4-port 10GbE Module                        CARD_STATE_UP       
         4

SSH@xmr01#sh cam-partition slot 4

CAM partitioning profile: ipv4-ipv6-2

Slot 4 XPP20SP 0:
# of CAM device                = 4
Total CAM Size                 = 917504 entries (63Mbits)

IP: Raw Size 786432, User Size 786432(0 reserved)
  Subpartition  0: Raw Size 2048, User Size 2048, (0 reserved)
  Subpartition  1: Raw Size 718865, User Size 718865, (0 reserved)
  Subpartition  2: Raw Size 54814, User Size 54814, (0 reserved)
  Subpartition  3: Raw Size 8245, User Size 8245, (0 reserved)
  Subpartition  4: Raw Size 1639, User Size 1639, (0 reserved)

IPv6: Raw Size 131072, User Size 65536(0 reserved)
  Subpartition  0: Raw Size 2048, User Size 1024, (0 reserved)
  Subpartition  1: Raw Size 117744, User Size 58872, (0 reserved)
  Subpartition  2: Raw Size 9328, User Size 4664, (0 reserved)
  Subpartition  3: Raw Size 1280, User Size 640, (0 reserved)
  Subpartition  4: Raw Size 384, User Size 192, (0 reserved)



Under normal conditions, the XMR would have one full table BGP session to an 
upstream, and 3 iBGP sessions (1 to another XMR, 2 to Juniper MX). Each of the 
iBGP sessions would provide full routes as well.

The issue did not surface until we attempted to integrate the MX network into 
the XMR network, and is affecting both of our XMR units when we send routes 
from the MX towards the XMR.

Thanks,
Daniel


From: James Cornman <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 11:31 AM
To: Daniel Stephens <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [f-nsp] Brocade XMR / Juniper iBGP Interoperability

Do you have -X model 10Gbps cards?

BR-MLX-10Gx4-X 4-port 10GbE Module

What about management modules? Do you have other full-route BGP sessions on 
that 10Gbps card, and just the Juniper ones are having issues? With a -X module 
as listed above, and ipv4-ipv6-2 CAM partition, you should see something like 
this:

SSH@router#show cam-partition slot 2

CAM partitioning profile: ipv4-ipv6-2

Slot 2 XPP20SP 0:
# of CAM device                = 4
Total CAM Size                 = 917504 entries (63Mbits)

IP: Raw Size 786432, User Size 786432(0 reserved)


Does it show that?


-James


On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Daniel Stephens 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi everyone,

I am having a strange issue with our Brocade XMRs when I attempt to exchange 
routes between a new set of Juniper MX iBGP peers and was looking to see if 
anyone had any recommendations.

The Brocade XMRs have two line cards, a 20-port 1G and a 4-port 10G card 
installed, and are running 5.6.0d firmware.

We are integrating two existing networks as a consolidation, with the one 
network running Brocade XMR and the other running Juniper MX routers. The issue 
surfaced on the XMRs when we removed route filters on the iBGP sessions between 
the XMR and MX routers. When lifting the filters and sending routes from the 
XMR towards the MX, everything is functioning as normal and the MX correctly 
learn the routes. Our issue becomes when we lift the filter and send routes 
from the MX towards the XMR. The XMR begins to load the routes correctly, and 
at some point during this process, the XMR stops forwarding traffic on the 
4-port 10G line card entirely (the card to which the MX routers interconnect), 
and all BGP sessions associated with that line card flap, and OSPF adjacencies 
drop and re-establish.

I am using the ipv4-ipv6-2 CAM partition profile on the XMR devices. Total 
number of routes attempting to be passed is a full table of roughly 610K routes.

Even when I remove an XMR unit from service and attempt to load routes from the 
MX into the XMR, the same anomaly occurs.

Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Daniel

_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp



--

James Cornman

Chief Technology Officer
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
212.792.9950 - ext 101

Atlantic Metro Communications

4 Century Drive, Parsippany NJ  07054

Colocation • Cloud Hosting • Network Connectivity • Managed Services
Follow us on Twitter: @atlanticmetro<https://twitter.com/atlanticmetro> • Like 
us on Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/atlanticmetro>
www.atlanticmetro.net<https://www.atlanticmetro.net/>
_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
[email protected]
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

Reply via email to