On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 08:43:48PM -0500, Julie Lein wrote: > Dear Sugar Community, > > We are MBA candidates at MIT working with Sugar Labs to help generate > awareness for the organization as an independent, open-source educational > innovator for children. To do this, we would love your input! > > We will be sending out a brief survey to assess how Sugar and Sugar Labs are > perceived by those who know them best. We would be very grateful if you > would take a few moments of your time to share your perspectives with us. > We will use your input to generate strategic recommendations for how Sugar > Labs can increase its reach throughout the global community.
Hi folks,
I started to take your survey and I had some curiosity as to how it
came about. That is, I wonder if you could tell us a bit about the
methodology behind the question set.
Not being experienced at academics and surveys, I'm not sure what the
considerations are from that direction about raising the curtain on
the methodology behind a survey. I was just thinking about how we
could apply the principles of the open source way, such as radical
transparency[1], to this process. How much of this process *can* be
opened and shared?
Thanks - Karsten
[1] From "The Open Source Way":
http://bit.ly/TOSWOpenDiscussions
--
name: Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Sr. Community Gardener
team: Red Hat Community Architecture
uri: http://TheOpenSourceWay.org/wiki
gpg: AD0E0C41
pgpanKEPHeIja.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ FourthGradeMath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/fourthgrademath
