When I mess up, I do it gloriously.
I wrote about the ABS not the ACM. Sorry about that. I'll be back with ACM
information.
(Is my face red? Oh, yeah.)
Regards,
Alex Johnson
10707 Haddington
Houston, TX 77043
713.722.2859 (office)
713.722.2700 (switchboard)
713.932.0222 (fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Alex (Foxboro) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 11:57 AM
To: Foxboro DCS Mail List
Subject: RE: ACM Module
Err, that should read, " The version of the document on my FoxDoc CD
is
Revision C and it lacks sizing information"
I should proofread my stuff. :-(
Regards,
Alex Johnson
10707 Haddington
Houston, TX 77043
713.722.2859 (office)
713.722.2700 (switchboard)
713.932.0222 (fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Alex (Foxboro) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 11:52 AM
To: Foxboro DCS Mail List
Subject: RE: ACM Module
The document B0193MK Rev D has sizing information. I'll send
Chad a
copy.
The version of the document on my FoxDoc CD is Revision D
and it
lacks
sizing information.
Basically, it is about as fast as a CP-10 and can hold more
blocks.
The Rev D document says that it can handle only 300 outgoing
points.
I
believe that this is a typographical error and that the
number
should be
3000, but I'm checking on it.
The AB interface options are:
* Micro-I/A
* over Ethernet
* over AB-DH
* DI-30 (FT or non-FT) over AB-DH
* AW-I over Ethernet
* AB Station (Co-Processor board installed in the
PLC/5)
For points per dollar, you should look at Micro-I/A. It is
faster
than the
DI for data transfer and has more RAM.
For a small and inexpensive total solution, the AW-I is
appropriate.
For a system with redundancy requirements, use the DI.
There are lots of other points to ponder, but this is a
summary.
Regards,
Alex Johnson
10707 Haddington
Houston, TX 77043
713.722.2859 (office)
713.722.2700 (switchboard)
713.932.0222 (fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----Original Message-----
From: Airhart, Chad M.
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 10:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ACM Module
Does anyone on the list have any experience using
the
Triconex/Foxboro ACM
module to pass data between the Triconex TMR PLC and
a
Foxboro
system? We
are trying to get some specific information on the
module
(i.e.
throughput,
configuration etc..) prior to deciding to buy and
install
one. We
haven't
really found what we are looking for in Foxdocs.
Does
anyone (Alex)
know if
there is a document available for that module
similar to
what is
available
for the Allen Bradley Station?
Chad Airhart
Instrument, Electrical & Control Systems Engineer
Equistar Chemicals, LP.
Victoria, TX
Wk. (361) 572-2568
Pgr. (361) 270-2214 alpha messaging at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fx. (361) 572-2541
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to
whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in
error
please
notify
the system manager.
www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the
Foxboro
Company.
All
postings from this list are the work of list
subscribers and
no
warranty
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any
information
disseminated
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you
agree
to hold
the
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps
which
might occur
due to
your application of information received from this
mailing
list.
To be removed from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe foxboro" in the Subject. Or, send
any mail
to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro
Company.
All
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and
no
warranty
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information
disseminated
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree
to hold
the
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which
might occur
due to
your application of information received from this mailing
list.
To be removed from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe foxboro" in the Subject. Or, send any mail
to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company.
All
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no
warranty
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information
disseminated
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold
the
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur
due to
your application of information received from this mailing list.
To be removed from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe foxboro" in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to
your application of information received from this mailing list.
To be removed from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe foxboro" in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
