On Fri May 5 18:01:23 2000 Warren Brown wrote...
>
>At the time of the I/A release, the system is made as
>current as can reasonably be with respect to the
>several hundred patches that Sun provides.
These systems were upgraded to 6,1, whch was brand new late last year
for Y2K. At the time the current Solaris release was 2.7, now it is
2.6, and I don't believe (and please correct e if I am wrong) that
Foxboro supports a newr version of Solaris than this.
It is quite reasonable (even desirable sometimes) to be 1 rev back on
an OS, 2 back is still suportable. Beyond that you are in the weeds.
--
Stan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] 843-745-3154
Charleston SC.
--
Windows 98: n.
useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and
a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system
originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit
company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition.
-
(c) 2000 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to
your application of information received from this mailing list.
To be removed from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe foxboro" in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
