On Mon Sep 25 11:52:11 2000 Forbes,Harry wrote...
>
>> >>
>> >> find / -fstype urfs -o name core -print.
>>
>> Now, if I understand this correctly then the only reason that the
>> "cookbook" answer from support works is because of the -o flag? Or
>> am I
>> still misunderstanding things here?
> [Forbes,Harry]
> Two words:
> I'm clueless.
> It seems to work, though.
Fraid not:
AP0550# find / -fstype urfs -o name core -print
find: bad option name
find: path-list predicate-list
Thanks for the help, though. At least now I know what the mysterious
"urfs" is.
--
Stan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] 843-745-3154
Charleston SC.
--
Windows 98: n.
useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and
a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system
originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit
company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition.
-
(c) 2000 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to
your application of information received from this mailing list.
To be removed from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe foxboro" in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
