Joe, I don't know about this particular device, but your options include:


Using the 19.2K serial port:


        Modicon Device Integrator
                This device assumes true Modicon emulation. I have a
checklist that I use to determine if it will work with devices that emulate
a Modicon PLC. Here's the checklist, but be aware that it may not be
perfect.


        Modicon Foreign Device Integrator.
                This device is much more flexible in dealing with "Modicon"
emulating devices that are not quite true emulations.


Using the Ethernet port

        If the Ethernet port supports Modbus over Ethernet, we have a
version of the AW70-Integrator that may be able talk to it. Again, you need
to qualify the device.


Hope this helps.


         << File: Modicon Options.doc >> 

Regards,

Alex Johnson
10707 Haddington
Houston, TX 77063
713.722.2859(v)
713.722.2700(sb)
713.932.0222(f)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 


        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Joe Gale (MP) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
        Sent:   Thursday, November 16, 2000 10:00 AM
        To:     Foxboro DCS Mail List (E-mail)
        Subject:        FW: GE UC2000 communication

        I sent this last week and didn't see any reply's.  Does anyone have
any
        information that would help me on this?

        Thanks,

        Joe Gale

        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: Joe Gale (MP) 
        > Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 2:18 PM
        > To:   Foxboro DCS Mail List (E-mail)
        > Subject:      GE UC2000 communication
        > 
        > We are in the planning stages of replacing our Generator Exciter
        > Controller with a GE UC2000.  I was wondering if anyone has had
any
        > experience interfacing to Foxboro with this product?  The
controller has
        > the following I/O ports available according to their description.
        > 
        > 1. 10 Mbps TCP/IP Ethernet port
        > 2. Genius Bus remote I/O channel
        > 3. one optional 19.2 kbps RTU or Modbus serial communications
port.
        > 
        > What interface would work the best for reliability?  We are not as
        > concerned about speed as reliability.
        > 
        > This will be interfaced into a node that is hosted by a AW51C,
that will
        > be running v6.1.2 at that time.
        > 
        > Thanks,
        > 
        > Joe Gale

        
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
        This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company.
All 
        postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no
warranty 
        is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information
disseminated 
        through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold
the 
        list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur
due to 
        your application of information received from this mailing list.

        To be removed from this list, send mail to 
        [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        with "unsubscribe foxboro" in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with "unsubscribe foxboro" in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to