[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At work, we have a plugin system which cannot work unless packages are used.
Agreed. > I also think that Lazarus would benefit from it. Currently Lazarus must be rebuilt for the installation of custom controls, which in Delphi can be loaded dynamically. If this behaviour is related to the lack of dynamic package support, I also vote for an implementation with high priority. I do not ask for a Delphi compatible solution, in detail I don't appreciate that Delphi packages are bound to a specific Delphi version. I understand that changes to FPC or to the RTL may require a rebuild of all affected packages, but perhaps this effect can be reduced, somehow. With regards to Lazarus it would be sufficient when the packages are rebuilt whenever required, but Lazarus itself should be able to dynamically load packages. DoDi _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
