Why are you looking at GC/Refcounting when the problem is the try..finally? It is better to rewrite the try..finally code using the C++ ABI for exception handling.
Where do you see improvements in the C++ ABI? Or even differences?
Windows implements this ABI, and every language should use it in the intended way. Perhaps FPC implements a different method on other systems?
FPC uses an platform independent method. The C++ ABI isn't used.
But it could be used on platforms that have a "fairly" stable and standardised C++ ABI (windows and Linux mainly). Other platforms can use the current FPC generic method as a fallback.
jamie.
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
