On Friday 08 July 2005 12:24, Gerhard Scholz wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Vinzent Hoefler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "FPC developers' list" <fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org> > Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 1:24 PM > Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] bug: Inc(v,i)/Dec(v,i) > > > OTOH, ... > > new abbreviation? what's that?
http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?String=exact&Acronym=otoh ;-) > With some accustomization, "inc(..." and "v := v + ..." is both good > readable, and normally (at least with checks off) it was assumed to > produce compacter and faster code. Especially when v is not a simple > variable, but a more complex one, e.g.: > Inc ( v[j]^[k].a[l], delta ) ; > And in such a case it's also better readable. Yes, if you really need to do such complex expressions. I tend to write smaller subroutines which take arguments. Vinzent. -- public key: http://www.t-domaingrabbing.ch/publickey.asc
pgpaGLZ96AKdh.pgp
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
