On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:05:04PM +0200, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 10:27:01AM +0200, Peter Vreman wrote:
> > > > Tom Verhoeff a ?crit :
> > > >
> > > > The point is that there is no stack trace with line numbers on the
> > > > (obviously correct) exception, in spite of the option -gl (even when
> > > > explicitly using SysUtils).
> > >
> > > The problem is that the framepointer register EBP is 0 in the sigcontext.
> > > We can't solve this.
> >
> > So, where should a solution come from? Where in the software/hardware
> > chain would a change be needed to make it work properly?
>
> For *nix: prt/crt0, there is a xorl %ebp,%ebp But there might be code
> that relies on this (main program's parent's frame being nil)
(Continuing the thread from the fpc-pascal list on fpc-devel.)
But why then is a stack trace generated for the unhandled assert exception
and not for the unhandled access violation (under Linux 386)?
Under Mac OS X (Darwin), I do get stack traces in both cases. However,
in spite of compiling with -gl, I don't get line numbers in either case.
What is the cause for that?
Tom
--
E-MAIL: T.Verhoeff @ TUE.NL | Fac. of Math. & Computing Science
PHONE: +31 40 247 41 25 | Eindhoven University of Technology
FAX: +31 40 247 54 04 | PO Box 513, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven
http://www.win.tue.nl/~wstomv/ | The Netherlands
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
