> I found out that for operators which are declared to be inline and have asm > code > inside the inlining option is ignored (I assume the same would be true for > procs/funcs). > > Is that intentional? Does it have a reason? Would be great if that could be > stopped.
Yes - needs complex parsing to determine if the asm is dangerous (e.g. EBP usage) - enhanced support not expect anytime soon due to complexity _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
