On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 04:21:16PM +0200, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > Any reason to re-implement the tempbuffer? Or were you just using an > older version? Please give me more datails (history) about "tempbuffer".
I can look deeply into ZeosLib and find out why it needs tempbuffer. Patch with constraints and tempbuffer is really not important. Petr -- Ing. Petr Kristan . EPOS PRO s.r.o., Bozeny Nemcove 2625, 530 02 Pardubice tel: +420 466335223 Czech Republic (Eastern Europe) fax: +420 466510709 _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
