> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:23:08PM +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > > > First sb who is more into practical aspects of the Linux kernel should say > > which kernel we are targeting. > > Defining the syscall numbers is independent of choosing the target linux > kernel, right ?
It should. But sometimes call names are changed to _old and new ones with the same name appear (with e.g. rt_ prefixed). So I'm not going to commit changes to sysnr.inc without it at least having some testing, or evaluation of possible painpoints of running on older versions. > > I don't even know which kernel I run on FC4 > > Probably 2.6.10 or so, look at "uname -a" ;-). > > I think most will have a 2.6 kernel by now, except for people running > odd architectures with lazy kernel maintainers. IIRC FC4 comes standard with at least 2.4 as choice. Don't underestimate peopl that run under standard circumstances. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
