> If there compelling reason why type definitions cannot be included in > class/object definitions? > Make it mode FPC to keep folks happy :) > > Quite often a type is defined in INTERFACE part, but only used within > class/object defined in same unit. > 1) This means that type is public. This is not always good thing in > OOese. > 2) Unit must be specified in child's child's USE list.
It breaks code and is therefor incompatible. A type symbol is never searched in an object, class or record symtable. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
