On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> Hi all, > > In revision 3111 TBufDataset is almost completely rewritten. I've tested > as much as I could, but it could be that you encounter problems with > sqldb which weren't there before. > > Please test if everything still works ok, and if not, tell me or submit > a bug-report. > > Further I have a question: now sqldb uses a linked-list record buffer, Why ? This goes against the recordset idea ? > the RecordCount and RecNo properties are something strange. > > What should I do with recordcount? I can add a counter which keep track > of the recordcount. Ie: it does inc(recordcount) if a record is > appended. > > Or I can do a real count of the records, each time recordcount is > called. > > And what about recno? Just define it as -1, or do a quick count to get > the current record number? > > What are your thoughts on this? The very idea of TBufDataset was that both recno and recordcount would always be available. So using a linked list is not so good. Why did you change that ? Michael. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
